GroundLuminous
02-21-2008, 06:00 PM
Hey everyone, I'm considering buying either the NP5793 or the NP9262, and I had a few questions about them of varying degrees of stupidity.
My major concern with my purchase is long term viability. Ideally, I'd like it to run games well for the next two years or so. To that end, how flexible exactly are either of the above laptops when it comes to future technology upgrades? If, for instance, a quad core penryn comes out next year, or god forbid the inevitable 9800m gtx (or even an 8850 gtx) comes out, how easily could they be adapted to either of the above laptops, hypothetically speaking? It seems to be largely sensitive to chipset, so is it realistic to assume that there will be very little upgradeability aside from the choices offered with the models right now?
The other question along the lines of long term viability is SLI. It seems that an 8800m SLI is available only for the 9262, while the 5793 lacks room. I'd probably end up going with one 8800 to begin with while uprading to SLI in the future. I also noticed that it's an additonal 695 dollars to do this. Do you envision the price dropping down the road (over the next 6 months to 1 year?) for the additonal 8800 and if so, any indication as to how much based on similar patterns?
My other question regarding SLI is as to its own viability to begin with. How well do expect the capacity of the two cards to "scale". I saw some preliminary 3d mark scores for the Dell laptop with the 8800m SLI, and it scored into the 13k range if I'm not mistaken. How well will this actually translate into upcoming games on the Sager? The major red flag that concerned me is Crysis, which seems to substantially ignore SLI. Hopefully this will be the exception and not the rule when it comes to future games (Far Cry 2, Fallout3, Battlefield 3 etc.) I guess what I'm asking is whether the 8800m SLI is "worth it", all told.
On a related note, I've also noticed that quad core processing is wholly irrelevant. Not just at the moment, but in the forseeable future. I have seen next to zero upcoming games that claim to support it in any meaningful way aside from Alan Wake. Even if more were to crop up, Crysis again teaches us that quad core support could end up being largely inefficient, if not outright lip service. Everyone is continually touting quad core processing as"the future", but at this point it seems vague in the extreme. Perhaps people better versed in the gaming/pc industry know something I don't about what is realistically expected in the future?
Anyway, that's all I have for the time being. I'm sure I'll have a few more questions on the way. Thanks in advance for the help everyone.
Cheers!
~Dan
My major concern with my purchase is long term viability. Ideally, I'd like it to run games well for the next two years or so. To that end, how flexible exactly are either of the above laptops when it comes to future technology upgrades? If, for instance, a quad core penryn comes out next year, or god forbid the inevitable 9800m gtx (or even an 8850 gtx) comes out, how easily could they be adapted to either of the above laptops, hypothetically speaking? It seems to be largely sensitive to chipset, so is it realistic to assume that there will be very little upgradeability aside from the choices offered with the models right now?
The other question along the lines of long term viability is SLI. It seems that an 8800m SLI is available only for the 9262, while the 5793 lacks room. I'd probably end up going with one 8800 to begin with while uprading to SLI in the future. I also noticed that it's an additonal 695 dollars to do this. Do you envision the price dropping down the road (over the next 6 months to 1 year?) for the additonal 8800 and if so, any indication as to how much based on similar patterns?
My other question regarding SLI is as to its own viability to begin with. How well do expect the capacity of the two cards to "scale". I saw some preliminary 3d mark scores for the Dell laptop with the 8800m SLI, and it scored into the 13k range if I'm not mistaken. How well will this actually translate into upcoming games on the Sager? The major red flag that concerned me is Crysis, which seems to substantially ignore SLI. Hopefully this will be the exception and not the rule when it comes to future games (Far Cry 2, Fallout3, Battlefield 3 etc.) I guess what I'm asking is whether the 8800m SLI is "worth it", all told.
On a related note, I've also noticed that quad core processing is wholly irrelevant. Not just at the moment, but in the forseeable future. I have seen next to zero upcoming games that claim to support it in any meaningful way aside from Alan Wake. Even if more were to crop up, Crysis again teaches us that quad core support could end up being largely inefficient, if not outright lip service. Everyone is continually touting quad core processing as"the future", but at this point it seems vague in the extreme. Perhaps people better versed in the gaming/pc industry know something I don't about what is realistically expected in the future?
Anyway, that's all I have for the time being. I'm sure I'll have a few more questions on the way. Thanks in advance for the help everyone.
Cheers!
~Dan